Instructional
Units
Components | Example
For the past twenty years, practical
and effective applications of instructional design have embraced many
of the formerly fragmented schools of learning psychology. The distance
instructional unit may include elements from the modern equivalents
of all four classical schools; behaviorist, cognitivist, social psychological,
and constructivist. Using the eclectic approach, an instructional unit
for a distance course will take into account a variety of different
learning styles, including both passive and active learning models.
A combination of both qualitative and quantitative measures of student
performance allows for both immediate (automated) and high quality (time-lagged)
instructor-based feedback.
Let's review the common components:
Advance Organizer: effectiveness can best be explained
by the Modern Cognitivist perspective, including memory mapping, and
cognitive frameworks. Advance Organizers usually contain the following
three components:
- Expository Organizer
- Comparative Organizer
- Learning Objectives
Streaming Lecture, Self-Paced Pathways, and Supplementary Readings:
- provides a framework that fills informational gaps and holds all
the outside reading and supplementary materials together.
- reiterates and clarifies the importance of specific points in order
to provide the proper hierarchy for the student's mental framework.
- updates the reading material, remediates, and addresses frequently
asked questions.
- adds additional material and comparative examples.
Formative Quiz: employs both the Neo-Behaviorist and
Modern Cognitivist perspectives, including the benefits of immediate
feedback, practice and drill, mastery, operant reinforcement, and the
development of mental frameworks. The low point values assigned are
just significant enough to motivate the student to keep up with the
material and interact with the text on a regular basis. The formative
quiz, while not a true assessment tool for you as the instructor, does
provide the student an opportunity to clarify their own level of knowledge
about the material in a low stakes setting.
Parsimony Statement: employs the Modern Cognitivist
perspective concerning Metacognition, a tool to help students' awareness
of the mental framework process. Self-generating very short summaries
(e.g., 25-word summaries) requires the student to reflect on the chapter
read and abstract from the chapter the essential message or theme that
characterizes the author's purpose in writing. It is suggested to have
students first practice developing summaries for short, easy, and well
written essays, then gradually introduce them to longer and more difficult
texts or entire chapters for them to summarize.
Discussion Web: may employ either or both the Contructivist
and Social Psychological perspectives, including the benefits of an
emphasis on learning goals rather than process, and the probable inclusion
of social interaction and cooperative conclusion making. This form of
distance instruction requires that at least three students are simultaneously
active in the course. Each discussion web assignment usually has two
dates associated with it: a required date for initial posting, and a
required date for at least one thoughtful response to another student's
initial posting.
Authentic Tasks: employs the Contructivist perspective,
and in the case of group web projects or live chatroom debates, the
Social Psychological perspective. These assignments should emphasize
active problem solving over the more passive transfer of information
associated with programmed instruction. The transfer and application
of existing knowledge to a new situation is the best indicator of deep
learning and intellectual development. Because of their inherently qualitative
feedback and variability of method, such assignments require more time
investment from both the students and the instructor, and may not be
systematically included in every unit.
Cumulative Summative Assessment: fulfills institutional
requirements. Cumulative Final Examinations are not learning tools for
students per se, since typically the only feedback the student receives
is a score or letter grade. This is often because instructors are on
a short deadline to turn in final grades, and therefore do not have
the necessary time to do in-depth feedback. Accordingly, there is not
much research that supports their use as part of the learning process.
However, such examinations can serve as a tool for the distance instructor
to benchmark student performance against other groups as part of the
instructional effectiveness assessment process.
For an in-depth instructor's guide to neo-behaviorist, modern cognitivist,
social psychological, and recent constructivist research as applicable
to higher education, please read:
Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human Learning, 3d ed. Upper Saddle
River, N.J.; Merrill.
If you have the chance to study this text, you will not regret the
time spent.
Example:
This table is representative of two units from Literature of the Bible
Online. Instructor, Wes Astin.
Professor Astin chose a weekly format
for this survey course, and included many suggested reading dates and
specific assignment deadlines spread over 12 units to assist first-time
distance learners with time management. Every three units has an associated
essay for a total of four essays due throughout the summer. There are
no summative mid-terms or finals. This format was deemed suitable for
Sophomore level or higher students with a standing GPA of 2.5 or higher.
The Advance Organizers below are the only active links for this demonstration.
| Week |
Hauer & Young Assignment |
Monday |
Wednesday |
Friday |
Saturday |
1
Course Introduction
Read the Discussion
Web Guidelines
Read the Parsimony
Exercise Guideline
Organizer |
Read
Chapters 1&2 |
May 12
Read Gen. 1:1-3:24 |
May 14
Discussion Web:
A prominent twentieth-century biblical scholar once said, "I
cannot take the Bible literally, but I can take it seriously."
What do you think this interpreter meant by this distinction?
Are there types of literature which need to be taken literally
in order to be taken seriously? If so, is the bible this type
of literature? Title your post as "week 1." |
May 16
Read Gen. 4:1-16
Discussion Web:
Submit responses to the views of two classmates. |
Submit Chapter 2
Parsimony Exercise by 6p.m. to wastin@ferrum.edu |
| Take
Quiz A
& Quiz B
(Both are Due by 4p.m. Fri) |
2
Organizer
View Streaming Presentation:
Story of Abraham in Cultural
Context |
Read
Chapter 3 |
May 19
Read Gen. 6:1-8:19 |
May 21 Read
Gen. 11:26-15:6 and 16:1-16
Discussion Web:
Abraham's wife, the beautiful Sarah, is taken to Pharaoh's house
while they are in Egypt. Abraham tells her to claim that she is
his sister, so that the Egyptians will not kill him. With this
in mind, do you think it is ever right to be deceptive in order
to protect yourself? Explain. Title your post as "week 2." |
May 23 Read
Gen. 21:1-21
Discussion Web:
Submit responses to the views of two classmates. |
Submit Chapter 3
Parsimony Exercise by 6p.m. to wastin@ferrum.edu |
Take Quiz
C (Due 4p.m. Fri) |
Continue to the next section: Summary & FAQ